» Archive for the 'Bankruptcy' Category

Bankruptcy As A Strategy – GM’s Views

Saturday, April 4th, 2009 by justinsmith

DETROIT, April 2 — The top officials of General Motors have been reeling under discomfort for months even on the mention of the word “bankruptcy.” The very idea of bankruptcy would scare off clients, they said, and wreak havoc on car sales.

 

But it grew obvious on March 27 that the American business icon would not be left with much of a choice.

 

Steven Rattner, who is the Chief of auto task force of President Obama, directed the leaders of the company to give this approach a serious thought.

 

The company’s new CE, Fritz Henderson, declared in an interview on Thursday that they essentially indicated that as per them bankruptcy is the most appropriate strategy.

 

In Washington, attending same meeting, Rattner refuted GM’s commercial strategy, called for the reconstitution of the company’s board and instantly ousted chief executive Rick Wagoner. He was replaced with Henderson. But in the midst of the entire episode, the idea of GM filing a bankruptcy apparently stood out for Henderson.

 

Now, the company is required to either build up a new business plan in a span of 60 days or lose more of government support along with several other challenges it is yet to face. Henderson is reported devoting a major segment of his time in comforting the company’s associates and the masses that while bankruptcy is just a distant possibility, he is working to make certain that the corporation would come out stronger.

 

While sharing his concern with the countless number of people that hold the corporate’s stake, comprising its worldwide composite of suppliers, dealers and others, Henderson discloses that President Obama has expressed his intention to help the industry several times.

 

Henderson expressed his gratitude while sharing the fact with the stakeholders of GM saying that they were thankful President Obama’s support. Obama has given a clear indication that the corporate would be viable and that it would go through this phase and that his government would support GM in passing through it.

 

The Obama government has given definite assurance to take steps that would enable the company to sail across bankruptcy.

 

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/02/AR2009040203703.html

 

 

Private Buyers Get Finance Assurance

Friday, March 27th, 2009 by justinsmith

 
On Monday 23 March, The United States offered to finance private investors to help clean up the banks of nearly  $1 trillion that is invested in toxic assets. This is blocking further lending and worsening the US recession situation.
 
The news raged the Markets that rallied on, in response to a disgusted reaction previous month to the public-private partnerships proposed by Timothy Geithner, Treasury Secretary, US.
 
Questions were raised on how to price the toxic assets. The stakes are high for Geithner. He seeks to gain the confidence of the investors. He says he has a viable program to continue the flow of credit once again.
 
According to this plan, in the initial stage, a new Public-Private Investment Plan will finance for $500 billion as purchasing power to buy the troubled or toxic assets, which the state refers more diplomatically to as legacy assets. The financial aid can be extended to as much as $1 trillion depending on the potential of expanding later, as per a fact sheet published by the US Treasury Department.
 
The TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) would be at the core of this plan. The financing package in capital will range between $75 billion and $100 billion and will assist in the existing financial bailout.
 
This will also include the share contributed by private investors, which the government estimates tol come up to 5 percent or even more. The government expects to leverage this program with the support of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as well as the Federal Reserve. It is hopeful of acquiring huge amounts of bad loans by executing the program.
 
The Treasury expects that private investors would be subsidized through the intended plan, but they may even stand losing there investments. However, the taxpayers would be in a position to share prospective profits when the assets are sold finally.

Source: http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/Mar242009/business20090323125923.asp